Comments with YouTube links get deleted less often than with other links.
Comments with more links get deleted more often than those with only one.
I've seen a post suggesting the assassination of a particular candidate stay up while my far more benign comments would get deleted.
I think posting in rapid succession gets picked up by the bot too.
OPs are less likely to get deleted than replies using the same words...presumably because they're viewed as less antagonistic.
Density of trigger words is also a factor.
Misspelling trigger words
It's a little maddening. You want to talk about serious topics, speaking about specifics, but you can't talk about the specifics of, say, someone's crimes without triggering the bot. It has more than just a superficializing influence. It keeps people from learning about disqualifying attributes of someone they want to see in the highest office in the land. It likely keeps women from learning how to keep themselves safe. It prevents due diligence.
Instead, conversation is kept superficial, dense with generalizations, and biased toward positive appraisals of the OP.
Comments with YouTube links get deleted less often than with other links.
Comments with more links get deleted more often than those with only one.
I've seen a post suggesting the assassination of a particular candidate stay up while my far more benign comments would get deleted.
I think posting in rapid succession gets picked up by the bot too.
OPs are less likely to get deleted than replies using the same words...presumably because they're viewed as less antagonistic.
Density of trigger words is also a factor.
Misspelling trigger words
It's a little maddening. You want to talk about serious topics, speaking about specifics, but you can't talk about the specifics of, say, someone's crimes without triggering the bot. It has more than just a superficializing influence. It keeps people from learning about disqualifying attributes of someone they want to see in the highest office in the land. It likely keeps women from learning how to keep themselves safe. It prevents due diligence.
Instead, conversation is kept superficial, dense with generalizations, and biased toward positive appraisals of the OP.